Not all Vitamin C is created equal
3rd November 2016
So, why is there so much interest in vitamin C?
Vitamin C is responsible for hundreds of processes within our body, some are minor and others crucial. For example, vitamin C is used by our body to make proteins which are the building blocks for many of our tissues and organs. Collagen, which is responsible for the formation of parts of our bones, muscles, cartilage and skin, is made using vitamin C.
Vitamin C also plays an important part in our immune function by improving the activity of some white blood cells such as ‘natural killer cells’ (the scary ones!) and also allowing our immune system to communicate and co-ordinate its attack against invaders (Wintergerst, 2006). Another important function is allowing us to properly absorb the type of iron found in plant-based foods (Gershoff, 1993).
Does it really matter where our Vitamin C comes from?
The short answer to this is ‘absolutely’. The Department of Health recommends that our vitamins are best absorbed from our diet but this is not always possible. In the last 50 years, nutrient levels in the soil and our diet have plummeted and nutritional deficiencies are common in our well-fed but nutrient-poor society. There are also times, such as when we are ill or overly taxed, when we may need to boost our levels of vitamin intake with supplements.
Vitamin C supplements may be either synthetically manufactured or taken in their natural form. Those in natural form are as close as we can get to the state they would be found in dietary sources, such as fruits and vegetables. Clearly, this best complies with the advice given by the Department of Health. Indeed, we know that natural forms of vitamin C last longer in the body than synthetic vitamin C (Uchida et al., 2011) and that it is more bioavailable in both blood and liver (Vinson et al. 1989). One of the reasons we see this disparity is because artificial ascorbic acid has a shorter half-life within the body, only staying in its full and effective form for about two hours. Natural vitamin C on the other hand seems to last much longer in the body and is absorbed more slowly, therefore remaining available to our cells for considerably longer.
Why choose Pukka Herbs’ Natural Vitamin C?
Pukka’s Natural Vitamin C is a whole fruit concentrate made from organic acerola and amla fruits. The concentrate is then bound with various flavonoids and other natural compounds from rosehips, lemon peel, bilberries and black pepper. These compounds help with the absorption of Pukka’s Natural Vitamin C into the bloodstream so it may be readily used by the body for all the important functions we mentioned above.
Unfortunately, the majority of synthetic vitamin C (or ascorbic acid) is produced using fermented corn syrup which is imported from China and may or may not have been genetically modified. The corn syrup is then treated with solvents such as acetone, sulphuric acid or sodium hydroxide to extract the ascorbic acid. The result is an artificial form of vitamin C that does not represent dietary sources and lacks the bioavailability of the natural compound. It is also made using methods that damage our planet and its sustainability for future generations.
Gershoff, S, Vitamin C (ascorbic acid): new roles, new requirements?, Nutr. Rev., 1993, Issue 51, pp.313-26
Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board, Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids, National Academy Press, 2000
Uchida, E et al, Absorption and Excretion of Ascorbic Acid Alone and in Acerola (Malpighia emarginata) Juice: Comparison in Healthy Japanese Subjects, Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2011, Vol.34 (11), pp.1744-1747.
Vinson JA et al. (1989): Relative bioavailability of trace elements and vitamins found in commercial supplements. In: Southgate DAT, Johnson IT, Fenwick GR (Eds) Nutrient availability: chemical and biological aspects. Royal Society of Chemistry, 1989, 404 pp.
Wintergerst, E et al, Immune-enhancing role of vitamin C and zinc and effect on clinical conditions, 2006, Ann Nutr Metab; 50(2):85-94